Read the Locker Room Talk Ethics Case on p. 284 (Ch. 4) of the text. Analyze the case using stakeholder impact analysis and the philosophical approaches to ethical decision making. Explain what you think Albert should do in a 700- to 1,050-word paper. Organize your paper using the following section outlines. Review the questions for each section to help you analyze the case and frame your paper. (Do not explicitly answer these questions within the body of your paper.) o Introduction What is the ethical dilemma in the case? What events led to the dilemma? When describing the dilemma, did you mistakenly propose a solution? o Stakeholders Involved Have you identified stakeholders? What is their stake in the case? Have you described every stakeholder in an objective, unbiased way? o Course of Action Have you clearly stated the course of action Albert should take? What reasons support your decision? What philosophical approach did you use to reach your decision? What are the weaknesses of your argument? Have you addressed counterarguments? ACC 260 Accounting Ethics: Keeping it Clean Course Syllabus Page 16 ACC 260 o Stakeholder Impact How do you think each stakeholder will be impacted by your decision? Are there potential impacts on stakeholders that are difficult to anticipate? Have you identified them? o Conclusion Do you present new evidence or analysis in the conclusion? Would it be more appropriate in another section of the paper? Have you summarized the dilemma, your decision, and the potential impact on stakeholders? Format your paper according to APA guidelines, including any references to the textbook or other sources. Post your completed paper as an attachment. Note: An important part of your grade on this assignment is demonstrating your ability to think critically: to suspend judgment while gathering evidence and consulting the various stakeholders’ positions, to analyze each position, to consider the impact of different courses of action, and then to make a decision and support it with evidence and logic.
Tutorial Purchased : 1 times Tutorial Rating : Not rated
Feedback received by students like you
Signup to Purchase this tutorial
ACC 260 Week 8-Assignment - Fully Applying a Decision-Making Framework.doc (0 B)
Fully Applying a Decision-Making Framework
University of Phoenix
While working on this assignment we are required to evaluate the ethic dilemma in this case. Albert is a CPA in this case, and many factors will need to be evaluated. While evaluating we will describe the dilemma, what events led to the dilemma, and a possible solution. The stakeholder involved would be the loan officer for the bank. The other stakeholder I believe would be the Ms. Wilson. This case has several dilemmas that are involved that affect each stakeholder. By Mr. Gable being a CPA the Wilson’s came to him to prepare a financial plan. Meanwhile Mr. Gable was asked to do periodic audits on random accounts for the bank. Much to his surprise the Wilson’s account was pulled. He was told personal information from the Wilson’s....